Speedtest.net host servers to test against (if you are in Mauritius)
Mauritius is connected to the Internet through various submarine communications cables. Few of which I know are SAFE, EASSy, LION and SAT-3/WASC – all connected to Africa. The best server to test against would therefore be any one hosted in the African continent. Well, NO. It turns out we are not directly connected to any African destination. Proof:

PS C:UsersKooshal> tracert -d speedtest.cpt.mweb.co.za Tracing route to speedtest.cpt.mweb.co.za [41.86.121.228] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 41.136.208.1 3 40 ms 24 ms 11 ms 196.27.70.121 4 15 ms 11 ms 12 ms 196.192.102.182 5 239 ms 235 ms 317 ms 80.231.76.101 <-- NOTICE HERE 6 * 327 ms 249 ms 80.231.76.73 7 241 ms 242 ms 238 ms 130.117.14.5 8 247 ms 250 ms 252 ms 154.54.57.101 9 236 ms 235 ms 239 ms 154.54.36.166 10 292 ms 300 ms 236 ms 149.6.98.6 11 394 ms 391 ms 433 ms 196.22.164.1 12 393 ms 389 ms 388 ms 196.28.178.99 13 394 ms 394 ms 389 ms 196.28.178.34 14 407 ms 450 ms 404 ms 196.41.133.166 15 405 ms 403 ms 405 ms 41.86.121.228 Trace complete.
I did the above traceroute to the speedtest.net server hosted in Cape Town after noticing a relatively high ping latency reported by a speed test against same server (I grabbed the host name from Chrome’s network inspector). Interestingly you will find above that instead of hopping directly to Africa, the packets are routed to the United Kingdom (see IP 80.231.76.101) and from there, they make their way to the speedtest.net server. I was like o.O after finding this, but it explained the high latency.
To confirm, I did a series of test to different destinations.
Paris, France
PS C:UsersKooshal> tracert -d speedtest.mediactive.fr Tracing route to tmp01.mediactive.fr [83.167.35.96] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 41.136.208.1 3 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 196.27.70.121 4 13 ms 12 ms 29 ms 196.192.102.57 5 287 ms 289 ms 667 ms 193.251.150.197 6 395 ms 478 ms 494 ms 193.251.240.2 7 399 ms 318 ms 756 ms 193.251.129.125 8 612 ms 663 ms 604 ms 81.52.179.194 9 245 ms 247 ms 245 ms 83.167.55.66 10 327 ms 338 ms 328 ms 83.167.40.254 ...
Here, we are directly connected to France.

London, UK
PS C:UsersKooshal> tracert -d speedtest.trancefm.co.uk Tracing route to speedtest.trancefm.co.uk [85.133.85.170] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 451 ms 205 ms 240 ms 41.136.208.1 3 76 ms 19 ms 10 ms 196.27.70.121 4 21 ms 13 ms 13 ms 196.192.102.86 5 239 ms 235 ms 317 ms 80.231.76.101 6 257 ms * 245 ms 80.231.76.73 7 325 ms 321 ms 321 ms 195.219.83.102 8 323 ms 370 ms 326 ms 4.69.139.88 9 522 ms 322 ms 321 ms 4.69.153.117 10 337 ms 332 ms 324 ms 4.69.141.190 11 * 327 ms * 4.68.117.111 12 360 ms 321 ms 321 ms 212.187.196.82 13 343 ms 323 ms 324 ms 85.133.16.1 14 331 ms 322 ms 323 ms 85.133.21.210 15 321 ms 322 ms 340 ms 85.133.85.170 Trace complete.
Here as well.
Cyberjaya, Malaysia
PS C:UsersKooshal> tracert -d 202.71.105.233 Tracing route to 202.71.105.233 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 12 ms 10 ms 12 ms 41.136.208.1 3 11 ms 11 ms 10 ms 196.27.70.121 4 12 ms 14 ms 12 ms 196.192.102.202 5 84 ms 83 ms 82 ms 58.27.14.61 6 85 ms 84 ms 84 ms 10.55.36.114 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 * * * Request timed out. ...
These were some of the best results I got, out of the 9 servers I tested. I’d therefore recommend these servers to accurately determine your international connection speed:
- Paris, France
- London, UK
- Cyberjaya, Malaysia
Don’t try to these African host servers, they are not reliable, even if they are closer to us.
Additionally, it’s more reasonable to test to some European or US server since all sites we access are hosted in these destinations.